Gaëlle Bloret-Pucci, Partner in the Intellectual Property Department of BCTG Avocats, and Hervé Bonnard, Professor of Law at the University of Burgundy and honorary member of the Paris Bar, have completely revised the Jurisclasseur (LexisNexis) Criminal Business Law booklet on trademark infringement.
The purpose was to integrate the last legislative reforms and important case law relating to the rules of prosecution applicable to trademark infringement, so as to enable practitioners, as well as students studying industrial property law, to find all the keys to understanding and relevant references in this area of law.
This reference book contains the following information:
- Civil tort and criminal offence of trademark infringement (V. n° 1 to 8): the definition of the material element of the criminal offence of infringement is carried out by reference to the civil infringement of the trademark right (V. n° 10 to 48).
- The criminal offence thus covers reproduction and imitation of a trademark (see nos. 10 to 32), and use of the genuine trademark that infringes the exclusive rights conferred on its owner by the registration (see nos. 33 to 45).
- The ‘generic’ offence of Article L. 716-10, paragraph 1c constitutes an unintentional offence. This is the criminal offence of negligence assessed in concreto (see nos. 50 to 56).
- The other specific offences require intentional fault (see nos. 57 to 63).
- The severity of the repression increases according to the degree of organization of the delinquent activity (see n° 64 to 72).
- The advantage of public action lies in the increased access to evidence through the investigative powers of the public prosecutor and/or the examining magistrate (see n° 73 to 87).
- The civil action makes it possible to obtain the cessation of acts of trademark infringement and compensation for the damage suffered by the owner (see nos. 89 to 99).
- The referral to the criminal courts does not prevent a referral to the civil courts within summary proceedings or on request in order to obtain provisional measures.
- The criminal court does not have jurisdiction to declare the invalidity or revocation of a trademark. In this case, the judge will declare the offence null and void (see n° 100 to 106).
- When invoked before a civil judge, trademark infringement tends to evolve towards an objective liability where fault is assessed in abstracto (see n° 107 to 146).
Gaëlle Bloret Pucci, partner, and Pauline de Drée, associate in the Intellectual Property department, have written an article in Be@Boss magazine, a magazine…
Published on 06 September 2022 at 10h57
BCTG Avocats on the signing of the partnership between Uber Eats and the French Football Federation (FFF)
BCTG Avocats advised Uber Eats, France’s number one home-delivery service*, on the signing of its partnership with the French Football Federation (FFF), while…
Published on 05 September 2022 at 16h29
Rehabilitation – What funding for the heritage at half-mast? Public actors have various tools to enhance their historical and cultural assets
Ludovic Babin, partner in the Public Contracts department, writes an article in the magazine Le Moniteur. What funding for heritage at half-mast? Public…
Published on 29 August 2022 at 15h50